Who could warrant such a monument, I wondered? A war hero? A great humanitarian? Even one of the lesser presidents? The text on the monument tells us:
"This memorial to Robert A. Taft, presented by the People to the Congress of the United States, stands as a tribute to the honesty, indomitable courage and high principles of a free government symbolized by his life."
Taft? I don't specialize in 20th century history, but I do know enough to recognize two Tafts: William Howard Taft, president between Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson; and the Taft of the anti-labor union Taft-Hartley Act. Could there be another? A quick Google search revealed that Robert A. Taft was, in fact, the second.
A block or two down from the monument, I found this:This juxtaposition of the Frances Perkins Building of the U.S. Department of Labor, only blocks away from the Taft monument isn't quite as ironic -- or funny -- as the placement of the Robert F. Kennedy building across the street from the J. Edgar Hoover building, but it is a prime example of D.C. This city, awash in historic monuments, buildings named after famous historic figures, and site of so many historic events, also seems completely oblivious to the narrative of that history.
Monuments and markers sit unexplained and covered in the generic language of heroism or bald facts. "Great leaders" or "event happened here" appear with no contextual explanation. As the person or event fade from currency, the monuments and markers intended to evoke memory or even awe without informing lose their reason for being.
Washington, then, begins to feel like a site of forgetting, even amid the markers to the past. This is a different sort of forgetting than in Texas, where buildings had expiration dates of 30 years and the past seemed forbidden from the landscape. Washington seems like the home of an Alzheimer's sufferer, wandering through a home filled with family photos and souvenirs from vacations, and unable to remember where they came from.
This is just a pondering as I see these random markers of an unexplained past of which I, the historian, am vaguely aware. This is not a definitive statement of the city or even of my thoughts on the subject.

3 comments:
It does seem that the best way to make somebody forgettable is to build a monument to hir in DC.
Does that mean you don't want your monument anymore, Gay Prof? I had a really nice place all picked out for it, too.
It's not so much that the person's nambe becomes forgettable -- except Senator Taft here. It's more that what they did and why they did it disappears. You can travel all the way to the top of the Washington Monument, in a city called Washington, and learn absolutely nothing about Washington himself or why he deserves a monument. This amuses me.
As a native Ohioan, I resent your ignorance of the Taft family! (One of them--I think a grandson of Robert A.--was Governor of Ohio back in the 90s and early 2000s.)
I used to live about 2 blocks from that Robert A. Taft memorial, on the Senate side of Capitol Hill, right around the corner from Union Station and the Supreme Court. I too wondered about its grandeur, and about how relatively forgotten Sen. Taft is now.
Thanks for the memories! I was transported back to 1995-96 immediately upon seeng your photos.
Historiann.com
Post a Comment