Thursday, May 07, 2009

The World in the Classroom

Do you remember that scene in A Fish Called Wanda in which John Cleese's character explains how difficult being British can be, always afraid that he might ask someone about their parents only to find out that they had died that morning, or inquire about the children only to learn they had burned in a fire the week before? That's me.

I don't tend to ask people about their lives, not because I'm not interested -- I usually am fascinated by other people's experiences (I gravitate toward biography in my own professional interests, for goodness sake!) -- but because I'm paranoid that I will ask the precise question that will trigger PTSD in someone. Silly, I know, but there it is.

Many of my colleagues want their students to draw upon their personal experiences and share those with the class. I tend to shy away from this both because of my neurosis, but also because this likelihood of PTSD is quite high.

I feel this especially in my world history class. This class usually has the highest number of international students of all of my courses, and many of these students come from places that you have seen on the news. Darfur, Rwanda, Uganda, Ethiopia, Guatemala, and so forth. Many are refugees. One of my collegues told me about a student who exhibited disabilities of such a nature that, put together her country of origin and her age, made him wonder what hell she had been through. Another of my collegues herself fled civil war.

Finding out that one of your students had been a sex slave or a child soldier or witnessed a massacre of their family is not too far outside of the realm of possibility. I'm afraid to scratch the surface because I am afraid of drawing blood unintentionally. Whatever their lives have been, for good or bad, those stories are theirs to tell when they want to tell them. They aren't my business unless they want to make them my business.

Last week, a student told me his. He came to me asking about our textbook. "Who is this guy?" he asked of the author. "Does he know anything?"

"What makes you ask?" I wanted to know.

"Well, I don't like the things he said about Africa," the student told me. "He gets a lot of it wrong, like my country."

This student is from Rwanda. If you are American or western, and don't know much about Africa, you probably know one thing about Rwanda, and it isn't pretty. He lived through that as a child. He told me more, too, but I don't want to tell his story for him here except to say that he told me that he could not celebrate his birthday, which fell during the period of those events, or talk about his life until he was older. Then, he said, he told his story and attained acceptance. I asked him to write a critique of that part of the text, for extra credit and for my own education. He willingly complied. He has a desire to tell the truth of what he witnessed, even if this offends other people.

This student is part of a group of friends in my class. They are so delightful in that they are just so young and goofy and full of life. They come from different parts of Africa, either recently or as children. They tease one another mercilessly, as boys do; and, while I know they are doing so in jest and affection, I do have to call them off of one another sometimes because they go too far for my comfort and, potentially, others in the class. I have forbid teasing the Nigerian about internet scams, for instance.

At the risk of writing about Africa like a typical, ignorant westerner -- no, to completely write like a typical, ignorant westerner, because that is what I am -- I am amazed by these young people. Amazed and humbled. "Who am I to stand up here and teach them about Africa and the world," I think, "when they have lived it?" (Teaching outside of anything resembling your area of expertise is one of the hazards of community college work.)

I don't know their lives. I don't want to pry; but they do bring me this information, and I overhear it in their conversations with one another. I hear their pride in their background, and I occasionally glimpse what that background has included. I also see their resilience. I want to know more, but, again, who am I? I let them tell me their stories when they feel comfortable, if at all. I won't demand that they share. This isn't therapy.

At the same time, I think their experiences and points of view are of vital importance in studying history. Sure, we can talk with certainty about the Holocaust, and rationally debunk the deniers; but what about recent events? These students' lives are part of the process of understanding history, and that process is raw and personal.

There is so much for me to read and to learn about the rest of the world, especially about Africa and the Caribbean (in fact, I feel a deep responsibility as a teacher and as a human to visit both places -- and not for the resorts). I'm of the old school of teaching, in which the teacher does, in fact, know more about the subject than the students. So standing before a class with patchy knowlege makes me feel like a fraud. Knowing that my students have lived some of the subject, makes me feel like giving up. It seems an awesome arrogance to teach them about their own lives.

Yet, my ignorance begins to guide me toward a way to approach this. As basic as this sounds, I am learning to begin with an issue. Human rights, civil war, western views of their homeland. I must create the skeleton of a subject, and let them flesh it out with the questions and animate it with the answers. This is tricky because I need a destination, and haven't quite learned where that destination should lie (the "outcomes" are so vague as to be useless in this regard -- which is actually good, but not useful).

This is a weird journey into new territory, and terrifying for me. Yet, at every step, I stumble upon the things that make the students curious. They are cynical as all hell, but they are also idealistic. They want to know more about the terror out there in the world, the evils of humanity, but not because they are ghouls. They are trying to understand "why....?" and "how...?" This is what perks them up when we get to the Holocaust. This is what make them actually wake up and lean forward during a film about the International Criminal Court.

7 comments:

Belle said...

OMG, what a dilemma. I rarely encounter international students chez nous, as they are ghetto-ized into special 'international' sections where their very poor English (assumed, even when they are Australian or African) won't 'harm' their grades.

It would be fascinating to find a way to incorporate their stories as primary sources into a World History class or historiography session. Do oral histories with the students, so that their voices are honored, included and shared. Of course, the possibilities for PTSD are enormous. But what an opportunity.

Clio Bluestocking said...

Being a community college, lots of our international students go to those similar sections -- there are interesting stories that come from that area about language acquisition and different types of English used in different parts of the world -- and those classes do their job because they come into other classes with better writing skills than many native speakers.

Our school did a sort of photo essay exhibit on the subject, and one or two of my students from last year were part of it. So incredibly awesome -- not in the Valley Girl sense of the word, but in the sense that you stand there in awe of what people endure, and that they are not on the news in other countries, but right there, in front of you. The exhibit was great, but how does that translate into the classroom?

I'm working on something that I will probably blog about in a day or two that might facilitate an opening for some of those stories. When I blog about it, let me know what you think! (Ahhhh! Now I feel committed to the post! Deadline! Ackk!)

Susan said...

I was thinking like Belle: if you had your students do oral histories, with guidelines, they would be learning methodology, and then using it to expand/critique the text. The good thing about this is that *all* your students could participate, not just those who'd had traumatic experiences or were from place X. Presumably, after all, the text talks about the US in the last 18 years -- what have their lives been?

Rea P said...

It's really nice of you to be concerned about people with traumatic pasts, but don't edit yourself too much. Most people develop coping mechanisms because we're faced every day with triggers. If you have a student who you know is very raw, then tread gently, of course.

It's very considerate of you to be sensitive, but as someone with (C)PTSD, I think I would rather have a mild panic attack in class and learn than miss out on something. (And I did, in college, deal with triggers - French Revolution, Augusto Pinochet - but got through it)

Bavardess - said...

That is challenging, but what a great opportunity for all your students to learn that history is never black and white, and to start to engage with some of those tricky issues like 'truth' and perspective in history writing. Giving them the opportunity to do oral histories or critique specific parts of the textbook is a good idea. They will learn some valuable methodological skills but I think it would also be validating to be able to tell their own stories.

Clio Bluestocking said...

I like that idea for an oral history. That way, the information is solicited by a peer, and offered to a peer. That peer may have a similar story, or may be more compassionate and understanding in a way that I cannot. If this is an oral history project, with some basic methods of oral history included, then they would have to do some research on the context of their subject, as well.

I also think that I can bring in kooky things like Holocaust deniers. I brought it up in our class when I showed the ICC movie, and asked how we know that the Holocaust happened in order to highlight the types of work the ICC investigator do. How do they prove that crimes against humanity actually did happen in a court of international law? So, the students could themselves act as evidence for the historical events that they witnessed -- even if it is just watching the news from a suburb in the U.S.

This could be really cool! I'll let you know how it goes (which will probably be in a year or so, since I won't be teaching this class again until next spring). Thank you everyone!


Also, the archivist in me has been thinking about how to record history, how to make an archive of ordinary lives in the midst of extraordinary events, so that historians have more evidence to draw upon in the future. This could be part of contributing -- but that is part of another project and post that I am working on.

Ink said...

I look forward to reading about your project. In the meantime, may I just say how much I admire your teaching ethos? Self-reflective, careful, thoughtful, and committed to honoring your students' voices. Starrifying you.

 

Unless noted otherwise, copyright for all written content held by Clio Bluestocking.