Saturday, June 20, 2009

Guilty Daddy-Issues

That last post was not at all planned. I was free-writing on fiction and ended up poking about in places near where the events of that post are stored. Then, this whole post spilled out. Since it was the first thing with any shape that I had written, I posted it. I didn't even consider the proximity to Father's Day. A few hours later, I felt a little idiotic, and then a bit guilty. Then, people started to respond to it, and it started to seem oddly important.

Next thing I know, three blogs with large readerships have linked to it. First, Historiann, then Shakesville, then Salon's Broadsheet. Holy Cow! I've had more hits in the past week than the whole year and a half prior. Thank you.

The first two links weren't so frightening, because they are sympathetic audiences. The last, well, there are a lot of concern trolls and men who see it their mission to remind women just how wrong and hypocritical feminism is, in the process acting as object lessons in the continued need for feminism; and they like to hang out in the comments at Broadsheet. Fortunately, I seem to be too tiny for them to bother, they would rather attack the writers at Salon with their clueless bats. Thank you to all of the supportive commenters who found something of value in the post.

Anyway, between the posting and the linking, I kept wanting to write. That post had a focus on misogyny in regard to female sexuality as it appeared and is perpetuated in my specific family. I wanted to write about the ways that the misogyny crippled me, made me unable to protect myself when I went out in the world. I wanted to write about the ways that being unable to protect myself made me vulnerable to some horribly exploitative men. I wanted to write about the ways that, as in writing the post, I keep trying to get that scene, that relationship, to end right only to end up more angry and disappointed and hurt. I wanted to write about how I'm just learning that there is no right. I wanted to also write about the homophobia inherent in that sort of misogyny. I wanted to write about a lot of things, and they all wanted to come out at the same time.

And, of course, I had to grade.

Something else wanted to get out, too, and it has made itself clear even as I write this particular post, so this is what this post will be about, now.

As the last post was linked, especially when it was linked by Salon, my guilt grew with every SiteMeter hit. I didn't regret what I wrote, because it was honest. It was what happened; and clearly it resounded because in it, there was truth. Truth about the incident, truth about me, truth about my father, and the larger truth about the intimate ways in which hatred of women is perpetuated. I wrote from that place where personal and political met over my body.

Still, I felt guilt. Justified or not, never underestimate the power of guilt. I also felt a responsibility to tell the whole story, if a whole story is at all possible, or at least give a better picture of the truth, something more accurately honest.

In that post, the clear villain is my dad. He seems like a monster; and if that were a full account of his personality, then he would be a monster. I could write other posts, like the one on homophobia, or the ways that he would go berserk and beat me or threaten to beat me, or even the ways that his desire to protect me actually made me vulnerable to exploitation because he would never teach me how to protect myself. All of these would give a grotesque picture of my father. They would not be wrong. They would not be lies, just as the last post was not a lie. They are true; but they aren't the whole messy truth.

If you met my father, you would never guess these ugly things about him. You'd think he was a bit old fashioned, but you also might be struck by the ways that he is not old fashioned or the ways in which he has worked to be part of the modern world. You might also be struck by how friendly he is. Not friendly in that schmoozing politician way, but genuinely friendly and kind. He will be interested in you, ask you about yourself, demonstrate curiosity and generosity. You'd like him.

You wouldn't be seeing a facade. He actually is very generous, to the point that you worry someone will take advantage of him. I feel there have been points in my life in which I have taken advantage of him, or failed to show deserved levels of gratitude toward the ways that he did provide me with real protection or a safety net. He held off my mother's rages against me when I decided to work for a year after high school, rather than go to college. Although I didn't ask for it, he got me the interview for the job that gave me that choice in the first place. He let me live at home through college and beyond, when I was unemployed or marginally employed and aimless. He helped me make the jump from That Place to the Middle of Nowhere (which was a good move), when I didn't even have the money to make a move to a better life. He lets me pay him back when I can, and told me that I didn't need to pay him back at all. He has given me tons of advice on cars, on homes, on professional behavior, on the millions of little things on which dads give advice.

When I think of the good things about my dad, I see several different scenes. I see him listening to music. He loves all sorts of folk-types of music. Not hippie-folk, but polka, klezmer, bagpipe -- you name it, especially if it has horns. He loves horns. I see him repair horns, hammering out dents, cleaning out valves, refinishing the polish, buffing them, testing their sound. He can take a piece of junk and turn it into something beautiful to see and hear. I see him listen to music. He disappears into the sound the way I did at rock concerts in high school. I will always remember him playing "Amazing Grace" by Black Watch and weeping. He can be terribly sentimental that way.

I remember him at both of my grandfathers' funerals, crying louder than anyone there. I remember him wailing when his father's casket closed. I remember him saying about my mother's father that my mother's father had shown him that a man can love another man as a friend. I remember that he was more upset at that funeral than my mother was. I see him more concerned for the welfare of my mother's mother than my mother is.

I see him building my dollhouse for me, back when I was a kid and wanted one so badly. I see him take joy in creating this thing for me and making me happy. I remember him also making model airplanes when I was a child, painting one pink for me to hang from my ceiling (the pink was my request -- I was a girly-girl, which was more complicated than you might think). I see him populating my brothers' ceilings with whole squadrons of planes.

I could go on and on with little, almost insignificant snapshots of the ways that he wanted us, loved us, and wanted to protect us from everything bad in the world; and I am shocked that these stories don't come out of me with the passion, the intensity, and the cohesion that the bad ones do. They are just as true as the bad ones, and they make me feel like I've betrayed him by remembering the bad ones at all.

I try to explain the bad stories, the ones that left behind the worst pain. I want to understand and forgive him for them. He is not an inherently, actively evil person; but he grew up the favorite child in an extended family, in the south, in the 1950s. How could he not have those appalling ideas about women? He was a product of his time. He is a person simultaneously good and bad. He is complicated and those bad stories are a facet of the full person. Were he anyone but my father, this would be easy to understand and internalize. The hollow sound of rationalization would not ring so loudly.

Yet, he is my father. We are part of this perverse intimacy between parents and children that can make sympathy nearly impossible. He did perpetuate misogyny, and he had a daughter who felt it. There is that undeniable fact that the events in those bad stories fundamentally distorted me, which caused me to make unwise choices out in the world, which compounded the same misery that those bad stories produced in the first place. There is the undeniable fact that my brothers, and now my nephews, learned the same misogyny. I cannot disavow the bad stories, and I cannot disavow the good ones.

Our family was always one of extremes. The combustible alchemy of my parents' marriage produced moments of intense love and equally intense hate, of abuse and salvation, of explosive emotion and deafening silence, all with nothing in the middle. Love was never simple, never pure, never without limits, often without respect, and never without intense pain.

Thus, with my dad, there is this monstrous father and this loving one. To tell only one side or the other is to betray one of us or the other. I have no idea how to reconcile any two parts of any of this -- the monstrous father and the loving father, the ungrateful daughter and the wounded daughter, the person of the father and the person of the daughter, him and me. I have no idea how to reconcile these parts and remain honest. I have no idea how to be whole.

16 comments:

Feminist Avatar said...

I think we call this the human condition.

This is a beautifully expressed piece, like your last.

Roxie Smith Lindemann said...

It's all in the trying.

Beautiful post. Don't feel guilty.

Janice said...

Clio, I wanted to comment here and tell you that you're brave and strong and human. And that your father is obviously human, too.

I would hope that someday he could see how much his misogyny has hurt you and work to rid himself of those attitudes but I suspect that it's too late for that which is such a sad thought, I can't hardly follow it any further.

Digger said...

Clio, thanks for writing and posting this. I "yes, exactly"'d my way through the whole thing.

I agree with RSL; don't feel guilty. Guilty is how others control your actions, even without being there. At the end of the day, be gentle with yourself. I hope writing the demons helps.

Flavia said...

Yes: it's easy to say, "well, people are all complicated, with some good and some bad!" and carry on when it's other people who are being discussed.

When it's family or even close friends, it's never that easy. When it's people who have a powerful impact on your life, and are there with you every day (whether in reality or in imagination) it's almost impossible to comprehend the good and the bad together--to really understand how someone can be all those things simultaneously.

But I'm glad you wrote this, as I'm glad you wrote your previous post.

Ink said...

Clio, you are amazing and courageous and honest and wise. Both posts are incredible and although I'm sad to hear about the pain you've gone through, I admire your ability to use your voice in such a powerful way. (((Clio)))

profacero said...

I had a whole comment to this composed with all sorts of interesting relevant info, and the Internet fell down, and it got lost.

I'll recompose it or something when I am less distraught and it is less late.

But FYI - due to father and brother related c--p today I came looking for your original post for solace, confirmation that it's not just me, etc.

profacero said...

And I nominated your posts to this contest

http://geoffreyphilp.blogspot.com/2009/06/growing-up-with-or-without-dad.html

I think you should confirm with Philp

The first one really addresses his question

I had not planned to write something and enter, but I did, but I cannot win because I do not address the question of how it shaped my life nearly so vividly

profacero said...

And: the Salon reaction is sort of freaked out by pain and wants to reassure everyone, especially the guys, that this is rare.

I am not sure it is.

Anyway when I found out today something my brother had done my FIRST reaction was to think, O God, what did I do to cause that, what must he be thinking to have done this to me, how can I convince him that he should not think that (so that my mother won't think it, so that my father won't think it, so that I won't have to shadow box against it with the whole family, perhaps without even knowing what it is, and finally so I do not internalize it if I do find out what it is) ...

And all this c--p in my family is caused by misogyny and so of course it is convenient that I think it is my fault!

Writer Vixen said...

I so understand your confusion (and sense of guilt) in trying to speak honestly about any of your experiences with your father. No matter what you say, no matter how factually true, it feels emotionally false on some level.

We have a natural tendency to think that if one thing is true then its opposite must be false. But one of the mysteries of life is that both can be true at the same time.

I think that learning to live with that dichotomy is possibly THE challenge of achieving emotional maturity. Thanks so much for conveying so eloquently what so many of us have felt in our lives, yet been unable to articulate.

Bavardess said...

Wow. Just, wow. This is a heart-searing piece of writing that really does go right to the epicentre of the human condition. You've touched raw nerves that would be familiar to many of us (definitely to me), but not everyone would be so brave and honest in putting it out there.

profacero said...

What Vixen said. My constant commenter Jennifer would point out that people aren't whole, and it's a good thing, too. Liberating not to be. It would take longer than I should spend to explain that fully, but... you get the idea.

dykewife said...

because of my situation around me, my dad and my older brother, i've been giving a whole lot of though to something along these lines.

my brother sexually abused me when i as a kid. he as a teenager. he also taught me how to ride a bike, protected me from bullies, put bandaids on scrapes and small cuts, played cards and board games with me, hunted for frogs with me and helped collect earth worms on rainy days for mom's garden as we walked home from school.

i know the good things about him. i know that he was a loving husband to his late wife and a loving step father to her son. i know that he cares deeply about his family, especially dad. i know that he's probably taking good care of dad now that he's back living with him.

that makes the bad, the abuse, more jarring and more painful. it stands out like a large boil on an otherwise smooth surface. it overshadows all the good i know is htere because he was supposed to keep me safe and take care of me. instead he used me. the generally good characteristics of the man is juxtaposed against the acts that profoundly harmed me.

there is nothing in him, no kindness, no charity, no generosity, that can overcome the harm he did. in some ways that makes him all the more, i want to use the word monstrous, but that's not it.

i think you know what i mean. it creates a paradox that is impossible to reconcile.

profacero said...

Impossible to reconcile, yes, and I am increasingly convinced that to try to (or claim to) reconcile such things does no particular good (except perhaps reassure onlookers and passers by). I'm far more comfortable letting all parts of the truth stand.

bitternsweet said...

Clio -- I'm catching up on some delayed blog reading and only just saw the two "daddy" posts. They are such beautiful, heart-breaking, and honest pieces of writing. Thank you for sharing them -- for sharing your story, which is, I fear, all too common. As you say at the end of the first post, similar scenes are played out across the country every day. What's most meaningful to me, however, is the hope that YOU represent -- that such a strong, self-aware, and un-cowed woman can emerge out of such an environment. Well, that's enough to keep us all working on the problem, isn't it?

Jennifer F. Armstrong said...

I think what is difficult is if you are trying to get help from an outside source concerning some patriarchal abusive behaviour,and you are trying to describe the whole situation to this outside source. But because somebody like me (and you, I bet, too) is fair, and wants to describe not only the negative attributes of a person, but the positive ones as well, you end up painting a picture that is neither of the abuser that is neither wholly good or wholly evil, but reveals disparate and even starkly contradictory parts to their character.

The listening patriarch immediately leaps upon the variable nature of these facts (which are, however, true) with a triumphant: "See! I caught you out in contradiction!"

Actually, though, it is the character set of the abuser that is contradictory.

Nothint to leap on there, unless you want to blame the victim some more.

 

Unless noted otherwise, copyright for all written content held by Clio Bluestocking.