Friday, August 10, 2012

Maybe I Misunderstand the Extent of this Story

Do you know about this development as described in this article in Slate.com? Google will now allow your gmail e-mails to show up in searches. What's more, like the Book of Face, they don't give a rat's ass is you like it or not. Searching and gmail are their toys and they will do what they want with them. You just have to suck it up.

Maybe I misunderstand the extent of this story, or some of the finer details about Google's implementations; but this sounds to me as if your gmail e-mail becomes public whenever you log on. The ability for Google to return your emails in a search, seems analogous to the Post Office opening your mail and posting bits on a bulletin board. That is probably a naive analogy, given that nothing at all is private once you log onto the internet. Nonetheless, don't you have a password because you expect a modicum of control over the eyes on your e-mails? That expectation is naive, too.

I have a gmail account, which I opened to use as a work account between jobs and will use as professional account for non-school business because I seem to change institutional affiliations frequently and who knows what might happen in the future. Things that become portable, like professional memberships, go with that account. I also have an ancient Yahoo account for personal business. So, even under my own name, I try to keep the personal and the professional separate. The problem comes with other people, regardless of age, who don't understand the need and even resent the necessity of having some distinctions between the two. I have also used the Yahoo account to contact people about "off the record" work things, but now I wonder if Yahoo will end up in the same place as gmail in search engines.

Perhaps a bit more disturbing is that the school uses gmail as its own e-mail -- what would you call it? server? service?  In any case, you essentially use gmail to log into your work e-mail. Of course, I have long since learned that your employer claims a right to all e-mails generated on that account, I have been careful of the ways that I use it and what I say on it. Nevertheless, this adds another layer to your employer's ability to crawl through your communication.

[ETA] Also, it seems as if there are some legal privacy questions here, too, such as communications between students and professors. Exchanges about grades in particular would fall under FERPA, so the school probably should have some sort of security or exemption from e-mails appearing in searches.

Entering the internet seems to have become more and more like entering a panopticon. At the same time, speech on the internet seems to have become less and less free (see the ruling that a Book of Face "like" is not protected speech). Paranoia to the point of opting out as much as you can is probably healthy when you have to be vigilant over even the smallest interaction online.

Oh, and even receipts? Really? I suppose the Google people all know how to protect their own online accounts, but would they seriously want some of their online purchases appearing in a search engine? That could be pretty embarrassing!

11 comments:

Madwoman with a Laptop said...

I read the story differently. Sounds to me like another aspect of personalized searching. It doesn't make the user's e-mails public. It brings up stuff from e-mails in connection with the user's searches. In other words, it's only visible to the user, not the whole world. Which is still creepy, but not nearly as creepy as what you describe. If your reading is correct, I'll never use Gmail -- or Google -- again!

Clio Bluestocking said...

Madwoman: I can see that reading of the story and hope you are correct! But, don't they already have that feature in most e-mail accounts? That's how I find a lot of old e-mails since my filing system is rather haphazard and not particularly precise.

undine said...

It may be only visible to the user, but I'm always afraid I'll forget and do a Google search when I'm connected to the overhead in class--and that could be awkward.

Clio Bluestocking said...

Undine: I do hope you and the Madwoman are right!

Ah yes, that overhead projector awkwardness. You forget for the space of a click and -- wham! -- your business is up for the class to see!

Clio Bluestocking said...

Undine: I do hope you and the Madwoman are right!

Ah yes, that overhead projector awkwardness. You forget for the space of a click and -- wham! -- your business is up for the class to see!

New Kid on the Hallway said...

I agree with Madwoman - search results from your gmail only show up in your own searches, NOT other people's (that is, your email isn't going public). The difference is that in the past, if you wanted to search your gmail, you had to be in gmail and search through the gmail interface, and you only got results from your email. Now, you can do a regular old google search from wherever (search bar or google home page or what), and results from your gmail will show up in the same set of results with stuff from all over the web. I personally don't see much use in this, because if I want to search my gmail I'll go into gmail to do it, and if I want to search the rest of the web, I probably don't care what's in my gmail. But I don't think it's really that creepy - just sort of useless. (They did something similar to this recently where they would add other "personal results" or the like to your google search results, in that they'd pull up posts by people in your G+ circles. Which I also found useless, and instantly turned off.)

Clio Bluestocking said...

New Kid: That makes sense, in a nonsensical sort of way. That is, yeah, if you can search your gmail, then you search your gmail. You don't need to go to Google, do you? As you say, "useless."

I think I'm pretty old school in this. It was like the last time I took algebra. The teacher would show short cuts, but I wanted to learn the long way. The longer way left less room for error. In this, too much efficiency becomes confusing. Too few barriers is to messy.

Incidentally, Blogger wants me to prove I'm not a robot by typing in those nonsense words plus whatever is in a picture, except the picture is not a letter or a word. It looks like a little window. What key is that?

Feminist Avatar said...

Apparently, the 'picture' word is not actually part of the robot test, but is a system that uses the population to translate scanned books into searchable text (ie like on google books). The bright spark that invented the captcha thing realised how much time it wasted and thought it might as well do something useful at the same time. So perhaps you symbol is just a random book symbol...

Clio Bluestocking said...

Feminist Avatar: I'm not entirely sure that I understand that. Are they getting people to transcribe books word-by-word through blog comments? Still, if it isn't really part of the captcha, then that would explain the reason that my comment went up with only the wavy word and not the window typed in. Also, the window actually looked like someone's doodle in ink, so maybe it was scanned marginalia. Ah, the odd odd world behind internet interface!

Feminist Avatar said...

Pretty much. Here you go:
http://www.google.com/recaptcha/learnmore

Clio Bluestocking said...

Dang! That's sneaky. Thanks!

 

Unless noted otherwise, copyright for all written content held by Clio Bluestocking.